© Erika M. Sparby
References for Digital Rhetorics and an Ethic of Responsibility in Online Aggression
Adapted from "Introduction: Toward and Ethic of Responsibility in Digital Aggression" in Digital Ethics: Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression.
Beck, E., Crow, A., McKee, H., Reilly, C., Vie, S., deWinter, J., Gonzales, L., & DeVoss, D.N. (2016). Writing in an age of surveillance, privacy, and net neutrality. Kairos, 20(2).
Brown, J. J., Jr. (2015). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetorics of software. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Citron. D., & Wittes, B. (2017, January 4). Follow buddies and block buddies: A simple proposal to improve civility, control, and privacy on Twitter. Lawfareblog.
Clinnin, K. and Manthey, K. (2019). How not to be a troll: Practicing rhetorical technofeminism in online comments. Computers and Composition.
Cloud, D. (2009). Foiling the intellectuals: Gender, identity framing, and the rhetoric of the kill in conservative hate mail. Communication and Cultural Critique, 2, pp. 457-479.
Coley, T. (Ed.). (2011). Computers and Composition Online.
DeVoss, D. N., & Porter, J. E. (2006). Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as new ethic of digital delivery. Computers and Composition, 23, pp. 178-210.
Duggan, M. (2017). Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center.
Fontaine, S., & Hunter, S. M. (Eds). (1998). Foregrounding ethical awareness in composition and English studies. Boynton/Cook: Portsmouth, NH.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale: New Haven and London.
Granville, K. (2018). Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. The New York Times.
Gruwell, L. (2017). Writing against harassment: Public writing pedagogy and online hate. Composition Forum, 36.
Gurak, L. (1999). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over Lotus MarketPlace and the Clipper Chip. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harrington, D. (1999). The ethical turn in English Studies. Composition Studies, 27(1), pp. 85-91.
Herrington, T. K. (2010). Intellectual property on campus: Students’ rights and responsibilities. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Jackson, A. (2016). Husband and wife never expected their Fitbit would tell them this…. CNN.com.
Jane, E.A. (2014). ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 28(4), pp. 558-570.
Jeong, S. (2018). The Internet of garbage. Washington, DC: Vox Media.
Jhaver, S., Ghoshal, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2018). Online harassment and content moderation: The case of blocklists. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(2), p. 1-33.
Johnson-Eilola, J. (2010). Among texts. In S. Selber (Ed.) Rhetorics and technologies: New directions in writing and communication (pp. 33-55). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Kennedy, K. (2016). Textual curation: Authorship, agency, and technology in Wikipedia and Chambers’s Cyclopaedia. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Logie, J. (2006). Peers, pirates, and persuasion: Rhetoric in the peer-to-peer debates. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). Association of Internet Researcher.
Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), pp. 137-157.
Milner, R.M. (2013). Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz. Fibreculture, 22.
Newton, Casey. (2019). The trauma floor: The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America. The Verge.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Phillips, W., & Milner, R.M. (2018). The internet doesn't need civility, it needs ethics. Vice.com.
Pilon, M. (2015). Divorced by data. Wired.com.
Poland, B. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. Lincoln: Potomac Books.
Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical Ethics and Internetworked Writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Profis, S. (2014). Do wristband heart trackers actually work? A checkup. CNET.com.
Reyman, J. (2010). The rhetoric of intellectual property: Copyright law and the regulation of digital culture. New York: Routledge.
Rife, M. C., Slattery, S., & DeVoss, D.N. (Eds.). (2011). Copy(write): Intellectual property in the writing classroom. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
Roberts, S. (2016). Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. In S. Noble and B. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 147-159). Peter Lang.
Selfe, C. L. & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), pp. 480-504.
Sparby, E. M. (2017). Digital social media and aggression: Memetic rhetoric in 4chan’s collective identity. Computers and Composition, 45, pp. 85-97.
Warnick, B. & Heineman, D. S. (2012). Rhetoric online: The politics of new media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Westbrook, S. (Ed.). (2009). Composition and copyright: Perspectives on teaching, text-making, and fair use. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Brown, J. J., Jr. (2015). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetorics of software. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Citron. D., & Wittes, B. (2017, January 4). Follow buddies and block buddies: A simple proposal to improve civility, control, and privacy on Twitter. Lawfareblog.
Clinnin, K. and Manthey, K. (2019). How not to be a troll: Practicing rhetorical technofeminism in online comments. Computers and Composition.
Cloud, D. (2009). Foiling the intellectuals: Gender, identity framing, and the rhetoric of the kill in conservative hate mail. Communication and Cultural Critique, 2, pp. 457-479.
Coley, T. (Ed.). (2011). Computers and Composition Online.
DeVoss, D. N., & Porter, J. E. (2006). Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as new ethic of digital delivery. Computers and Composition, 23, pp. 178-210.
Duggan, M. (2017). Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center.
Fontaine, S., & Hunter, S. M. (Eds). (1998). Foregrounding ethical awareness in composition and English studies. Boynton/Cook: Portsmouth, NH.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale: New Haven and London.
Granville, K. (2018). Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. The New York Times.
Gruwell, L. (2017). Writing against harassment: Public writing pedagogy and online hate. Composition Forum, 36.
Gurak, L. (1999). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over Lotus MarketPlace and the Clipper Chip. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harrington, D. (1999). The ethical turn in English Studies. Composition Studies, 27(1), pp. 85-91.
Herrington, T. K. (2010). Intellectual property on campus: Students’ rights and responsibilities. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Jackson, A. (2016). Husband and wife never expected their Fitbit would tell them this…. CNN.com.
Jane, E.A. (2014). ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 28(4), pp. 558-570.
Jeong, S. (2018). The Internet of garbage. Washington, DC: Vox Media.
Jhaver, S., Ghoshal, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2018). Online harassment and content moderation: The case of blocklists. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(2), p. 1-33.
Johnson-Eilola, J. (2010). Among texts. In S. Selber (Ed.) Rhetorics and technologies: New directions in writing and communication (pp. 33-55). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Kennedy, K. (2016). Textual curation: Authorship, agency, and technology in Wikipedia and Chambers’s Cyclopaedia. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Logie, J. (2006). Peers, pirates, and persuasion: Rhetoric in the peer-to-peer debates. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). Association of Internet Researcher.
Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), pp. 137-157.
Milner, R.M. (2013). Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz. Fibreculture, 22.
Newton, Casey. (2019). The trauma floor: The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America. The Verge.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Phillips, W., & Milner, R.M. (2018). The internet doesn't need civility, it needs ethics. Vice.com.
Pilon, M. (2015). Divorced by data. Wired.com.
Poland, B. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. Lincoln: Potomac Books.
Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical Ethics and Internetworked Writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Profis, S. (2014). Do wristband heart trackers actually work? A checkup. CNET.com.
Reyman, J. (2010). The rhetoric of intellectual property: Copyright law and the regulation of digital culture. New York: Routledge.
Rife, M. C., Slattery, S., & DeVoss, D.N. (Eds.). (2011). Copy(write): Intellectual property in the writing classroom. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
Roberts, S. (2016). Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. In S. Noble and B. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 147-159). Peter Lang.
Selfe, C. L. & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), pp. 480-504.
Sparby, E. M. (2017). Digital social media and aggression: Memetic rhetoric in 4chan’s collective identity. Computers and Composition, 45, pp. 85-97.
Warnick, B. & Heineman, D. S. (2012). Rhetoric online: The politics of new media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Westbrook, S. (Ed.). (2009). Composition and copyright: Perspectives on teaching, text-making, and fair use. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.